He is trying to justify what the Pope said.
In a detailed discussion posted on X on Wednesday, Bishop Robert Barron shared his perspective on the recent controversy sparked by Pope Francis’ remarks, where he seemed to suggest the inherent goodness of humanity, leading to accusations of heresy against him.
During a recent interview on “60 Minutes,” Pope Francis expressed optimism about the world, stating that he finds hope in witnessing both tragedies and acts of goodness by individuals. His assertion that the human heart is fundamentally good drew criticism from some quarters, with commentators citing biblical passages emphasizing the goodness of God alone and humanity’s sinful nature.
Barron, serving as bishop of the Diocese of Winona-Rochester in Minnesota, sought to contextualize the pope’s statement within theological debates dating back to the Protestant Reformation. He highlighted the contrast between the Protestant doctrine of “total depravity,” which views humans as entirely corrupted by sin, and the Catholic perspective, which acknowledges the Fall but maintains the integrity of certain spiritual faculties.
Explaining the Catholic position, Barron outlined that while humans are incapable of saving themselves due to the effects of sin, there remains an intact foundation upon which grace can operate. He referenced the Council of Trent, which affirmed the need for salvation while recognizing the continued presence of spiritual faculties despite the Fall.
Barron clarified that when Pope Francis speaks of humanity’s fundamental goodness, he does not negate the need for a Savior but rather underscores the Catholic belief in the preservation of essential spiritual capacities.
Reactions to Barron’s explanation varied, with some users appreciating the nuanced perspective while others expressed a desire for greater precision in Pope Francis’ communication.